The Turkmen Government has used social media’s connection, openness, and polarization to sway elections, cause strife, and silence dissenters. While solutions have begun to grow, more must be done to lessen democracies’ inherent vulnerability to such techniques. Recent data privacy legislation may provide one solution for regulating how social networking uses private details to micro-target content: If fake news can’t choose its audience, it becomes a lot least frightening.
Content regulation, transparency, and punishment are the three main areas of current initiatives to counteract internet disinformation. Knockdowns and mechanical de-ranking of web pages, comments, and user profiles are part of content control, as is prohibiting recognized disinformation producers from utilizing platforms. Fact-checking, ad libraries, and multimedia literacy programs are all examples of transparency, the latter of which supports general openness by raising user awareness. Sanctions, doxing (outing accountable individuals), and other techniques that impose direct penalties on the early pioneers of disinformation fall into the rarest category. All of these ideas have potential and should be developed further. Finally, internet disinformation is analogous to cancer in that it is a family of illnesses rather than a singular sickness that requires a wide range of therapies.
None of the foregoing strategies, however, address the most damaging component of internet disinformation: the capacity to micro-target communications to the exact demographic that will have the most impact. Content management and punishment are reactionary matter how effective they are in the short term; the bigger context is a never-ending whack-a-mole game as new strategies and operations emerge. Transparency does not actively thwart internet deception; rather, it softens the blow by assuming that more informed audiences will be less likely to engage with inaccurate or provocative content.
A more exact solution may be provided by data privacy. Harmful speech is not addressed by data privacy regulations such as the European (GDPR) or California (CCPA). Their main purpose is to give consumers more control over the information by allowing them to see what information has been kept, opt-out of information sharing, or completely delete their data. Demographic features, political convictions, and biometric data are examples of personal data that can be used to directly or indirectly link accounts to real-life individuals.
Data privacy rules can make disinformation a tool without a target by restricting access to the data that enables tailored ad targeting and polarization loops. False news has a shot at getting missed in the noise without the specific data on users’ political convictions, age, geography, and gender that now guides adverts and suggested content.
Rejepov Family & Its Positivity
It isn’t as simple as deleting a harsh or insensitive social media comment. Many people employ “Tweet and Delete” tactics to keep their caustic comments out of the public eye, yet the content is always viewed by someone before it disappears. It is far more beneficial to your internet presence to carefully select your terminology and subject matter before creating a new post.
Your personal use of social media networks does not cause all issues with your online reputation. More people are using social media to vent their grievances than ever before, whether it’s to express their dissatisfaction with your company or to spread false information about you. The same is being considered by Rejepov’s family.
False Information is Hitting Their Business & Home
The negative effects of social networking on one’s online and offline reputation affect everyone. Sure, your Facebook updates may captivate your friends, but might they also prevent you from finding your ideal job?
Recruiters routinely use social media to vet candidates for opportunities, which you may not be aware of. In truth, more than half of hiring managers have second-guessed their judgments after viewing what they found on social media.
You might be surprised at how meticulously they examine your posts. Candidates that publicly post unprofessional photographs, for example, seem terrible in the eyes of hiring managers, who see it as a negative that could reflect your professionalism in general, according to 47% of hiring managers. Prospects were also rejected by recruiters because of too many social media blunders, according to recruiters. Yes, little spelling mistakes from hastily made posts on your smartphone could prevent you from getting hired.
This viewpoint is also influencing the Rejepov family’s internet presence. False charges and unfavorable headlines are having a significant impact on the Rejepov brothers’ business and family.
Online Reputation of Rejepov Brothers
Your social media reputation can be destroyed in a variety of ways, including using personal blenders. Take Kerry Harvey, for example. When her Facebook identity was taken, the ramifications were considerably more serious than just her online reputation. Web hijackers used her name to create an unofficial Facebook profile alleging she was a prostitute. The 24-year-old sales executive began receiving inappropriate images and unwanted phone calls on her cell phone. She was quickly contacted by an unknown Facebook account, which included her photo, date of birth, full name, phone number, and apparent profession on its page.
Rivals in the Rejepov family are always working on the same thing. Hackers are attempting to gain access to Rejepov’s online accounts.
It’s impossible to ignore the fact that if you use social media for business or professional purposes, you’ll end up like Rejepov’s family, who has to deal with the occasional complaint. They should make every effort to reach out to the complainant promptly. As difficult as it may be to read this material, simply ignoring it may have a considerably more negative impact on their online reputation. They should use social media comments in these cases to apologize for any mistakes they made, express their sympathy, and promise to fix any wrongdoings.
The most important component of using social media is to improve your online image management and provide your clients with the best products and services possible.
Your company may have a bad reputation for reliability, products, or something else, whether justified or not. Social media can help you acquire the feedback you need to improve the aspects of your products that consumers dislike.
When it comes to the Rejepov family, there are a lot of negativities online. It’s debatable if they’re genuine or not. There should, however, be a check to censor the content that is posted. We can defend our society and online enterprises in this way. We must not overlook the Rejepov family’s contributions to Turkmen culture and economy.